2018 Easdale

RESULTS FOR ALL CLASSES  HERE.

ROUTEGADGET NOW AVAILABLE HERE

CONTROL DESCRIPTIONS HERE

RACE PHOTOS HERE

Planner’s Comments

I was asked if I would like to plan the SLMM 2018 in the summer last year. When informed of the area to be used I had no hesitation in saying yes. I live in Oxford and became very familiar with the M6 over the subsequent months!

I appreciated being the first to have a go at planning the new Fairfield course, with its unusual format. When I plan orienteering score courses I try to spread the highest points controls evenly around the area used. Often planners place them far away and up big hills where only the very fit can go, virtually guaranteeing that they top the results.  A more even spread makes them think more, whilst enabling the less fit to get a satisfying number of points. It was pleasing to see such a large entry for this course

For the linear courses I had two main aims. One was to offer some interesting route choices, and the nature of the terrain certainly gave opportunities for this. The other was to reduce “crocodiles” forming up, particularly on Sunday. I tried to do this by circulating the courses in opposing loops. For example, Harter went NE on Saturday and SW on Sunday, Carrock SW and NE.

Winning times vary from too short to about right, and too long. The Controllers Report explains how we arrived at the course lengths and climbs, so I won’t repeat that here.

I must apologise for the lengthy queue at control 114 on Sunday morning. I’ve planned countless orienteering events and appreciate the need for multiple SI boxes at busy sites. We failed to make the connection between the big mass start and the number of competitors very soon arriving at the bridge. That lesson will be learnt.

I would like to thank the Controllers, not just for checking things out on the hills but also for a considerable amount of behind-the-scenes administration work.

My thanks also go to those who kindly volunteered to bring in controls on a hot Sunday afternoon.

Neville Baker

Planner 2018 SLMM

Controller’s Comments

Congratulations to everyone who took part at the weekend. Conditions were really tough, given the heat and very light breeze. Ironically this was the first year we had an official set of pre-planned bad weather courses…

Congratulations also to Nev, for planning a set of courses which provided a good mix of route choice and detailed navigation.

We attempted to be more scientific in working out appropriate course lengths this year. We analysed results from the last 12 Saunders MMs, taking into account the actual distance and climb on the “best” route (rather than those given on the descriptions), to come up with a variant of “Naismith’s Rule for the top teams on each course. This was then used to check that the planned courses would give the required winning time.

Judging from the results and competitor feedback, it would seem that we got it wrong for the Wansfell, Harter, Carrock and Kirkfell courses, while Klets, Bowfell and Bedafell were about right. Also we expected the winner to just about get all of the controls on Fairfield which proved to be the case.

We’ve attempted to understand the reasons in the hope of improving things in future years. We think there are three main factors involved:

  1. The heat clearly slowed competitors down. It also created a larger range of times than usual as the longer you are out the more effect the heat has.
  2. We were aiming for winning times close to those given in the course details on the website whereas, historically they have, generally, been significantly shorter. The result was that this year’s courses were intentionally tougher than in recent years. With hindsight, we probably should have mentioned this in the preliminary details. Apologies.
  3. This year’s courses had proportionally more climb than average, which is inevitable in this part of the Lakes. Our calculations didn’t fully take into account the “non-linear” effects of climb (i.e. the more climb you do the slower you get at climbing). We will do some further analysis on this.

We add our apologies to Nev’s regarding the control on the bridge at the start of day 2. We’ll remember this for the future.

Hopefully see you next year.

Dan and Karen Parker

Controllers 2018 SLMM

Scroll to top